source: nikanabo/current/xdelta/diy/draft-korn-vcdiff.txt@ 616

Last change on this file since 616 was 185, checked in by geyser, 17 years ago
File size: 59.3 KB
Line 
1 David G. Korn, AT&T Labs
2 Joshua P. MacDonald, UC Berkeley
3 Jeffrey C. Mogul, Compaq WRL
4Internet-Draft Kiem-Phong Vo, AT&T Labs
5Expires: 09 November 2002 09 November 2001
6
7
8 The VCDIFF Generic Differencing and Compression Data Format
9
10 draft-korn-vcdiff-06.txt
11
12
13
14Status of this Memo
15
16 This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance
17 with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
18
19 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
20 Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
21 other groups may also distribute working documents as
22 Internet-Drafts.
23
24 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
25 months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
26 documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-
27 Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as
28 "work in progress."
29
30 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
31 http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
32
33 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
34 http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
35
36
37Abstract
38
39 This memo describes a general, efficient and portable data format
40 suitable for encoding compressed and/or differencing data so that
41 they can be easily transported among computers.
42
43
44Table of Contents:
45
46 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................ 2
47 2. CONVENTIONS .................................................. 3
48 3. DELTA INSTRUCTIONS ........................................... 4
49 4. DELTA FILE ORGANIZATION ...................................... 5
50 5. DELTA INSTRUCTION ENCODING ................................... 9
51 6. DECODING A TARGET WINDOW ..................................... 14
52 7. APPLICATION-DEFINED CODE TABLES .............................. 16
53 8. PERFORMANCE .................................................. 16
54 9. FURTHER ISSUES ............................................... 17
55 10. SUMMARY ...................................................... 18
56 11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................. 18
57 12. SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS ...................................... 18
58 13. SOURCE CODE AVAILABILITY ..................................... 18
59 14. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ................................. 18
60 15. IANA CONSIDERATIONS .......................................... 19
61 16. REFERENCES ................................................... 19
62 17. AUTHOR'S ADDRESS ............................................. 20
63
64
651. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
66
67 Compression and differencing techniques can greatly improve storage
68 and transmission of files and file versions. Since files are often
69 transported across machines with distinct architectures and performance
70 characteristics, such data should be encoded in a form that is portable
71 and can be decoded with little or no knowledge of the encoders.
72 This document describes Vcdiff, a compact portable encoding format
73 designed for these purposes.
74
75 Data differencing is the process of computing a compact and invertible
76 encoding of a "target file" given a "source file". Data compression
77 is similar but without the use of source data. The UNIX utilities diff,
78 compress, and gzip are well-known examples of data differencing and
79 compression tools. For data differencing, the computed encoding is
80 called a "delta file", and, for data compression, it is called
81 a "compressed file". Delta and compressed files are good for storage
82 and transmission as they are often smaller than the originals.
83
84 Data differencing and data compression are traditionally treated
85 as distinct types of data processing. However, as shown in the Vdelta
86 technique by Korn and Vo [1], compression can be thought of as a special
87 case of differencing in which the source data is empty. The basic idea
88 is to unify the string parsing scheme used in the Lempel-Ziv'77 style
89 compressors [2], and the block-move technique of Tichy [3]. Loosely
90 speaking, this works as follows:
91
92 a. Concatenate source and target data.
93 b. Parse the data from left to right as in LZ'77 but
94 make sure that a parsed segment starts the target data.
95 c. Start to output when reaching target data.
96
97 Parsing is based on string matching algorithms such as suffix trees [4]
98 or hashing with different time and space performance characteristics.
99 Vdelta uses a fast string matching algorithm that requires less memory
100 than other techniques [5,6]. However, even with this algorithm, the
101 memory requirement can still be prohibitive for large files. A common
102 way to deal with memory limitation is to partition an input file into
103 chunks called "windows" and process them separately. Here, except for
104 unpublished work by Vo, little has been done on designing effective
105 windowing schemes. Current techniques, including Vdelta, simply use
106 source and target windows with corresponding addresses across source
107 and target files.
108
109 String matching and windowing algorithms have large influence on the
110 compression rate of delta and compressed files. However, it is desirable
111 to have a portable encoding format that is independent of such algorithms.
112 This enables construction of client-server applications in which a server
113 may serve clients with unknown computing characteristics. Unfortunately,
114 all current differencing and compressing tools, including Vdelta, fall
115 short in this respect. Their storage formats are closely intertwined
116 with the implemented string matching and/or windowing algorithms.
117
118 The encoding format Vcdiff proposed here addresses the above issues.
119 Vcdiff achieves the below characteristics:
120
121 Output compactness:
122 The basic encoding format compactly represents compressed or delta
123 files. Applications can further extend the basic encoding format
124 with "secondary encoders" to achieve more compression.
125
126 Data portability:
127 The basic encoding format is free from machine byte order and
128 word size issues. This allows data to be encoded on one machine
129 and decoded on a different machine with different architecture.
130
131 Algorithm genericity:
132 The decoding algorithm is independent from string matching and
133 windowing algorithms. This allows competition among implementations
134 of the encoder while keeping the same decoder.
135
136 Decoding efficiency:
137 Except for secondary encoder issues, the decoding algorithm runs
138 in time proportional to the size of the target file and uses space
139 proportional to the maximal window size. Vcdiff differs from more
140 conventional compressors in that it uses only byte-aligned
141 data, thus avoiding bit-level operations, which improves
142 decoding speed at the slight cost of compression efficiency.
143
144 The Vcdiff data format and the algorithms for decoding data shall be
145 described next. Since Vcdiff treats compression as a special case of
146 differencing, we shall use the term "delta file" to indicate the
147 compressed output for both cases.
148
149
1502. CONVENTIONS
151
152 The basic data unit is a byte. For portability, Vcdiff shall limit
153 a byte to its lower eight bits even on machines with larger bytes.
154 The bits in a byte are ordered from right to left so that the least
155 significant bit (LSB) has value 1, and the most significant bit (MSB),
156 has value 128.
157
158 For purposes of exposition in this document, we adopt the convention
159 that the LSB is numbered 0, and the MSB is numbered 7. Bit numbers
160 never appear in the encoded format itself.
161
162 Vcdiff encodes unsigned integer values using a portable variable-sized
163 format (originally introduced in the Sfio library [7]). This encoding
164 treats an integer as a number in base 128. Then, each digit in this
165 representation is encoded in the lower seven bits of a byte. Except for
166 the least significant byte, other bytes have their most significant bit
167 turned on to indicate that there are still more digits in the encoding.
168 The two key properties of this integer encoding that are beneficial
169 to a data compression format are:
170
171 a. The encoding is portable among systems using 8-bit bytes, and
172 b. Small values are encoded compactly.
173
174 For example, consider the value 123456789 which can be represented with
175 four 7-bit digits whose values are 58, 111, 26, 21 in order from most
176 to least significant. Below is the 8-bit byte encoding of these digits.
177 Note that the MSBs of 58, 111 and 26 are on.
178
179 +-------------------------------------------+
180 | 10111010 | 11101111 | 10011010 | 00010101 |
181 +-------------------------------------------+
182 MSB+58 MSB+111 MSB+26 0+21
183
184
185 Henceforth, the terms "byte" and "integer" will refer to a byte and an
186 unsigned integer as described.
187
188
189 From time to time, algorithms are exhibited to clarify the descriptions
190 of parts of the Vcdiff format. On such occasions, the C language will be
191 used to make precise the algorithms. The C code shown in this
192 document is meant for clarification only, and is not part of the
193 actual specification of the Vcdiff format.
194
195 In this specification, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT",
196 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", and "MAY" document are to be interpreted as
197 described in RFC2119 [12].
198
199
2003. DELTA INSTRUCTIONS
201
202 A large target file is partitioned into non-overlapping sections
203 called "target windows". These target windows are processed separately
204 and sequentially based on their order in the target file.
205
206 A target window T of length t may be compared against some source data
207 segment S of length s. By construction, this source data segment S
208 comes either from the source file, if one is used, or from a part of
209 the target file earlier than T. In this way, during decoding, S is
210 completely known when T is being decoded.
211
212 The choices of T, t, S and s are made by some window selection algorithm
213 which can greatly affect the size of the encoding. However, as seen later,
214 these choices are encoded so that no knowledge of the window selection
215 algorithm is needed during decoding.
216
217 Assume that S[j] represents the jth byte in S, and T[k] represents
218 the kth byte in T. Then, for the delta instructions, we treat the data
219 windows S and T as substrings of a superstring U formed by concatenating
220 them like this:
221
222 S[0]S[1]...S[s-1]T[0]T[1]...T[t-1]
223
224 The "address" of a byte in S or T is referred to by its location in U.
225 For example, the address of T[k] is s+k.
226
227 The instructions to encode and direct the reconstruction of a target
228 window are called delta instructions. There are three types:
229
230 ADD: This instruction has two arguments, a size x and a sequence of
231 x bytes to be copied.
232 COPY: This instruction has two arguments, a size x and an address p
233 in the string U. The arguments specify the substring of U that
234 must be copied. We shall assert that such a substring must be
235 entirely contained in either S or T.
236 RUN: This instruction has two arguments, a size x and a byte b that
237 will be repeated x times.
238
239 Below are example source and target windows and the delta instructions
240 that encode the target window in terms of the source window.
241
242 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p
243 a b c d w x y z e f g h e f g h e f g h e f g h z z z z
244
245 COPY 4, 0
246 ADD 4, w x y z
247 COPY 4, 4
248 COPY 12, 24
249 RUN 4, z
250
251
252 Thus, the first letter 'a' in the target window is at location 16
253 in the superstring. Note that the fourth instruction, "COPY 12, 24",
254 copies data from T itself since address 24 is position 8 in T.
255 This instruction also shows that it is fine to overlap the data to be
256 copied with the data being copied from as long as the latter starts
257 earlier. This enables efficient encoding of periodic sequences,
258 i.e., sequences with regularly repeated subsequences. The RUN instruction
259 is a compact way to encode a sequence repeating the same byte even though
260 such a sequence can be thought of as a periodic sequence with period 1.
261
262 To reconstruct the target window, one simply processes one delta
263 instruction at a time and copy the data either from the source window
264 or the being reconstructed target window based on the type of the
265 instruction and the associated address, if any.
266
267
2684. DELTA FILE ORGANIZATION
269
270 A Vcdiff delta file starts with a Header section followed by a sequence
271 of Window sections. The Header section includes magic bytes to identify
272 the file type, and information concerning data processing beyond the
273 basic encoding format. The Window sections encode the target windows.
274
275 Below is the overall organization of a delta file. The indented items
276 refine the ones immediately above them. An item in square brackets may
277 or may not be present in the file depending on the information encoded
278 in the Indicator byte above it.
279
280 Header
281 Header1 - byte
282 Header2 - byte
283 Header3 - byte
284 Header4 - byte
285 Hdr_Indicator - byte
286 [Secondary compressor ID] - byte
287
288[@@@ Why is compressor ID not an integer? ]
289[@@@ If we aren't defining any secondary compressors yet, then it seems
290that defining the [Secondary compressor ID] and the corresponding
291VCD_DECOMPRESS Hdr_Indicator bit in this draft has no real value. An
292implementation of this specification won't be able to decode a VCDIFF
293encoded with this option if it doesn't know about any secondary
294compressors. It seems that you should specify the bits related to
295secondary compressors once you have defined the first a secondary
296compressor. I can imagine a secondary-compressor might want to supply
297extra information, such as a dictionary of some kind, in which case
298this speculative treatment wouldn't go far enough.]
299
300 [Length of code table data] - integer
301 [Code table data]
302 Size of near cache - byte
303 Size of same cache - byte
304 Compressed code table data
305 Window1
306 Win_Indicator - byte
307 [Source segment size] - integer
308 [Source segment position] - integer
309 The delta encoding of the target window
310 Length of the delta encoding - integer
311 The delta encoding
312 Size of the target window - integer
313 Delta_Indicator - byte
314 Length of data for ADDs and RUNs - integer
315 Length of instructions and sizes - integer
316 Length of addresses for COPYs - integer
317 Data section for ADDs and RUNs - array of bytes
318 Instructions and sizes section - array of bytes
319 Addresses section for COPYs - array of bytes
320 Window2
321 ...
322
323
324
3254.1 The Header Section
326
327 Each delta file starts with a header section organized as below.
328 Note the convention that square-brackets enclose optional items.
329
330 Header1 - byte = 0xE6
331 Header2 - byte = 0xD3
332 Header3 - byte = 0xD4
333
334HMMM
335
3360xD6
3370xC3
3380xC4
339
340 Header4 - byte
341 Hdr_Indicator - byte
342 [Secondary compressor ID] - byte
343 [Length of code table data] - integer
344 [Code table data]
345
346 The first three Header bytes are the ASCII characters 'V', 'C' and 'D'
347 with their most significant bits turned on (in hexadecimal, the values
348 are 0xE6, 0xD3, and 0xD4). The fourth Header byte is currently set to
349 zero. In the future, it might be used to indicate the version of Vcdiff.
350
351 The Hdr_Indicator byte shows if there are any initialization data
352 required to aid in the reconstruction of data in the Window sections.
353 This byte MAY have non-zero values for either, both, or neither of
354 the two bits VCD_DECOMPRESS and VCD_CODETABLE below:
355
356 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
357 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
358 | | | | | | | | |
359 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
360 ^ ^
361 | |
362 | +-- VCD_DECOMPRESS
363 +---- VCD_CODETABLE
364
365 If bit 0 (VCD_DECOMPRESS) is non-zero, this indicates that a secondary
366 compressor may have been used to further compress certain parts of the
367 delta encoding data as described in Sections 4.3 and 6. In that case,
368 the ID of the secondary compressor is given next. If this bit is zero,
369 the compressor ID byte is not included.
370
371[@@@ If we aren't defining any secondary compressors yet, then it seems
372this bit has no real value yet..]
373
374 If bit 1 (VCD_CODETABLE) is non-zero, this indicates that an
375 application-defined code table is to be used for decoding the delta
376 instructions. This table itself is compressed. The length of the data
377 comprising this compressed code table and the data follow next. Section 7
378 discusses application-defined code tables. If this bit is zero, the code
379 table data length and the code table data are not included.
380
381 If both bits are set, then the compressor ID byte is included
382 before the code table data length and the code table data.
383
384
3854.2 The Format of a Window Section
386
387 Each Window section is organized as follows:
388
389 Win_Indicator - byte
390 [Source segment length] - integer
391 [Source segment position] - integer
392 The delta encoding of the target window
393
394
395 Below are the detail of the various items:
396
397[@@@ Here, I want to replace the Win_Indicator with a source-count,
398followed by source-count length/position pairs?]
399
400 Win_Indicator:
401 This byte is a set of bits, as shown:
402
403 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
404 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
405 | | | | | | | | |
406 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
407 ^ ^
408 | |
409 | +-- VCD_SOURCE
410 +---- VCD_TARGET
411
412
413 If bit 0 (VCD_SOURCE) is non-zero, this indicates that a segment
414 of data from the "source" file was used as the corresponding
415 source window of data to encode the target window. The decoder
416 will use this same source data segment to decode the target window.
417
418 If bit 1 (VCD_TARGET) is non-zero, this indicates that a segment
419 of data from the "target" file was used as the corresponding
420 source window of data to encode the target window. As above, this
421 same source data segment is used to decode the target window.
422
423 The Win_Indicator byte MUST NOT have more than one of the bits
424 set (non-zero). It MAY have none of these bits set.
425
426 If one of these bits is set, the byte is followed by two
427 integers to indicate respectively the length and position of
428 the source data segment in the relevant file. If the
429 indicator byte is zero, the target window was compressed
430 by itself without comparing against another data segment,
431 and these two integers are not included.
432
433 The delta encoding of the target window:
434 This contains the delta encoding of the target window either
435 in terms of the source data segment (i.e., VCD_SOURCE
436 or VCD_TARGET was set) or by itself if no source window
437 is specified. This data format is discussed next.
438
439
4404.3 The Delta Encoding of a Target Window
441
442 The delta encoding of a target window is organized as follows:
443
444 Length of the delta encoding - integer
445 The delta encoding
446 Length of the target window - integer
447 Delta_Indicator - byte
448 Length of data for ADDs and RUNs - integer
449 Length of instructions section - integer
450 Length of addresses for COPYs - integer
451 Data section for ADDs and RUNs - array of bytes
452 Instructions and sizes section - array of bytes
453 Addresses section for COPYs - array of bytes
454
455
456 Length of the delta encoding:
457 This integer gives the total number of remaining bytes that
458 comprise data of the delta encoding for this target window.
459
460 The delta encoding:
461 This contains the data representing the delta encoding which
462 is described next.
463
464 Length of the target window:
465 This integer indicates the actual size of the target window
466 after decompression. A decoder can use this value to allocate
467 memory to store the uncompressed data.
468
469 Delta_Indicator:
470 This byte is a set of bits, as shown:
471
472 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
473 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
474 | | | | | | | | |
475 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
476 ^ ^ ^
477 | | |
478 | | +-- VCD_DATACOMP
479 | +---- VCD_INSTCOMP
480 +------ VCD_ADDRCOMP
481
482 VCD_DATACOMP: bit value 1.
483 VCD_INSTCOMP: bit value 2.
484 VCD_ADDRCOMP: bit value 4.
485
486 As discussed, the delta encoding consists of COPY, ADD and RUN
487 instructions. The ADD and RUN instructions have accompanying
488 unmatched data (that is, data that does not specifically match
489 any data in the source window or in some earlier part of the
490 target window) and the COPY instructions have addresses of where
491 the matches occur. OPTIONALLY, these types of data MAY be further
492 compressed using a secondary compressor. Thus, Vcdiff separates
493 the encoding of the delta instructions into three parts:
494
495 a. The unmatched data in the ADD and RUN instructions,
496 b. The delta instructions and accompanying sizes, and
497 c. The addresses of the COPY instructions.
498
499 If the bit VCD_DECOMPRESS (Section 4.1) was on, each of these
500 sections may have been compressed using the specified secondary
501 compressor. The bit positions 0 (VCD_DATACOMP), 1 (VCD_INSTCOMP),
502 and 2 (VCD_ADDRCOMP) respectively indicate, if non-zero, that
503 the corresponding parts are compressed. Then, these parts MUST
504 be decompressed before decoding the delta instructions.
505
506 Length of data for ADDs and RUNs:
507 This is the length (in bytes) of the section of data storing
508 the unmatched data accompanying the ADD and RUN instructions.
509
510 Length of instructions section:
511 This is the length (in bytes) of the delta instructions and
512 accompanying sizes.
513
514 Length of addresses for COPYs:
515 This is the length (in bytes) of the section storing
516 the addresses of the COPY instructions.
517
518 Data section for ADDs and RUNs:
519 This sequence of bytes encodes the unmatched data for the ADD
520 and RUN instructions.
521
522 Instructions and sizes section:
523 This sequence of bytes encodes the instructions and their sizes.
524
525 Addresses section for COPYs:
526 This sequence of bytes encodes the addresses of the COPY
527 instructions.
528
529
5305. DELTA INSTRUCTION ENCODING
531
532 The delta instructions described in Section 3 represent the results of
533 string matching. For many data differencing applications in which the
534 changes between source and target data are small, any straightforward
535 representation of these instructions would be adequate. However, for
536 applications including data compression, it is important to encode
537 these instructions well to achieve good compression rates. From our
538 experience, the following observations can be made:
539
540 a. The addresses in COPY instructions are locations of matches and
541 often occur close by or even exactly equal to one another. This is
542 because data in local regions are often replicated with minor changes.
543 In turn, this means that coding a newly matched address against some
544 set of recently matched addresses can be beneficial.
545
546 b. The matches are often short in length and separated by small amounts
547 of unmatched data. That is, the lengths of COPY and ADD instructions
548 are often small. This is particularly true of binary data such as
549 executable files or structured data such as HTML or XML. In such cases,
550 compression can be improved by combining the encoding of the sizes
551 and the instruction types as well as combining the encoding of adjacent
552 delta instructions with sufficiently small data sizes.
553
554 The below subsections discuss how the Vcdiff data format provides
555 mechanisms enabling encoders to use the above observations to improve
556 compression rates.
557
558
5595.1 Address Encoding Modes of COPY Instructions
560
561 As mentioned earlier, addresses of COPY instructions often occur close
562 to one another or are exactly equal. To take advantage of this phenomenon
563 and encode addresses of COPY instructions more efficiently, the Vcdiff
564 data format supports the use of two different types of address caches.
565 Both the encoder and decoder maintain these caches, so that decoder's
566 caches remain synchronized with the encoder's caches.
567
568 a. A "near" cache is an array with "s_near" slots, each containing an
569 address used for encoding addresses nearby to previously encoded
570 addresses (in the positive direction only). The near cache also
571 maintains a "next_slot" index to the near cache. New entries to the
572 near cache are always inserted in the next_slot index, which maintains
573 a circular buffer of the s_near most recent addresses.
574
575 b. A "same" cache is an array with "s_same" multiple of 256 slots, each
576 containing an address. The same cache maintains a hash table of recent
577 addresses used for repeated encoding of the exact same address.
578
579
580 By default, the parameters s_near and s_same are respectively set to 4
581 and 3. An encoder MAY modify these values, but then it MUST encode the
582 new values in the encoding itself, as discussed in Section 7, so that
583 the decoder can properly set up its own caches.
584
585 At the start of processing a target window, an implementation
586 (encoder or decoder) initializes all of the slots in both caches
587 to zero. The next_slot pointer of the near cache is set
588 to point to slot zero.
589
590 Each time a COPY instruction is processed by the encoder or
591 decoder, the implementation's caches are updated as follows, where
592 "addr" is the address in the COPY instruction.
593
594 a. The slot in the near cache referenced by the next_slot
595 index is set to addr. The next_slot index is then incremented
596 modulo s_near.
597
598 b. The slot in the same cache whose index is addr%(s_same*256)
599 is set to addr. [We use the C notations of % for modulo and
600 * for multiplication.]
601
602
6035.2 Example code for maintaining caches
604
605 To make clear the above description, below are example cache data
606 structures and algorithms to initialize and update them:
607
608 typedef struct _cache_s
609 {
610 int* near; /* array of size s_near */
611 int s_near;
612 int next_slot; /* the circular index for near */
613 int* same; /* array of size s_same*256 */
614 int s_same;
615 } Cache_t;
616
617 cache_init(Cache_t* ka)
618 {
619 int i;
620
621 ka->next_slot = 0;
622 for(i = 0; i < ka->s_near; ++i)
623 ka->near[i] = 0;
624
625 for(i = 0; i < ka->s_same*256; ++i)
626 ka->same[i] = 0;
627 }
628
629 cache_update(Cache_t* ka, int addr)
630 {
631 if(ka->s_near > 0)
632 { ka->near[ka->next_slot] = addr;
633 ka->next_slot = (ka->next_slot + 1) % ka->s_near;
634 }
635
636 if(ka->s_same > 0)
637 ka->same[addr % (ka->s_same*256)] = addr;
638 }
639
640
6415.3 Encoding of COPY instruction addresses
642
643 The address of a COPY instruction is encoded using different modes
644 depending on the type of cached address used, if any.
645
646 Let "addr" be the address of a COPY instruction to be decoded and "here"
647 be the current location in the target data (i.e., the start of the data
648 about to be encoded or decoded). Let near[j] be the jth element in
649 the near cache, and same[k] be the kth element in the same cache.
650 Below are the possible address modes:
651
652 VCD_SELF: This mode has value 0. The address was encoded by itself
653 as an integer.
654
655 VCD_HERE: This mode has value 1. The address was encoded as
656 the integer value "here - addr".
657
658 Near modes: The "near modes" are in the range [2,s_near+1]. Let m
659 be the mode of the address encoding. The address was encoded
660 as the integer value "addr - near[m-2]".
661
662 Same modes: The "same modes" are in the range
663 [s_near+2,s_near+s_same+1]. Let m be the mode of the encoding.
664 The address was encoded as a single byte b such that
665 "addr == same[(m - (s_near+2))*256 + b]".
666
667
6685.3 Example code for encoding and decoding of COPY instruction addresses
669
670 We show example algorithms below to demonstrate use of address modes more
671 clearly. The encoder has freedom to choose address modes, the sample
672 addr_encode() algorithm merely shows one way of picking the address
673 mode. The decoding algorithm addr_decode() will uniquely decode addresses
674 regardless of the encoder's algorithm choice.
675
676 Note that the address caches are updated immediately after an address is
677 encoded or decoded. In this way, the decoder is always synchronized with
678 the encoder.
679
680 int addr_encode(Cache_t* ka, int addr, int here, int* mode)
681 {
682 int i, d, bestd, bestm;
683
684 /* Attempt to find the address mode that yields the
685 * smallest integer value for "d", the encoded address
686 * value, thereby minimizing the encoded size of the
687 * address. */
688
689 bestd = addr; bestm = VCD_SELF; /* VCD_SELF == 0 */
690
691 if((d = here-addr) < bestd)
692 { bestd = d; bestm = VCD_HERE; } /* VCD_HERE == 1 */
693
694 for(i = 0; i < ka->s_near; ++i)
695 if((d = addr - ka->near[i]) >= 0 && d < bestd)
696 { bestd = d; bestm = i+2; }
697
698 if(ka->s_same > 0 && ka->same[d = addr%(ka->s_same*256)] == addr)
699 { bestd = d%256; bestm = ka->s_near + 2 + d/256; }
700
701 cache_update(ka,addr);
702
703 *mode = bestm; /* this returns the address encoding mode */
704 return bestd; /* this returns the encoded address */
705 }
706
707 Note that the addr_encode() algorithm chooses the best address mode using a
708 local optimization, but that may not lead to the best encoding efficiency
709 because different modes lead to different instruction encodings, as described below.
710
711 The functions addrint() and addrbyte() used in addr_decode() obtain from
712 the "Addresses section for COPYs" (Section 4.3) an integer or a byte,
713 respectively. These utilities will not be described here. We simply
714 recall that an integer is represented as a compact variable-sized string
715 of bytes as described in Section 2 (i.e., base 128).
716
717 int addr_decode(Cache_t* ka, int here, int mode)
718 { int addr, m;
719
720 if(mode == VCD_SELF)
721 addr = addrint();
722 else if(mode == VCD_HERE)
723 addr = here - addrint();
724 else if((m = mode - 2) >= 0 && m < ka->s_near) /* near cache */
725 addr = ka->near[m] + addrint();
726 else /* same cache */
727 { m = mode - (2 + ka->s_near);
728 addr = ka->same[m*256 + addrbyte()];
729 }
730
731 cache_update(ka, addr);
732
733 return addr;
734 }
735
736
7375.4 Instruction Codes
738
739 As noted, the data sizes associated with delta instructions are often
740 small. Thus, compression efficiency can be improved by combining the sizes
741 and instruction types in a single encoding, as well by combining certain
742 pairs of adjacent delta instructions. Effective choices of when to perform
743 such combinations depend on many factors including the data being processed
744 and the string matching algorithm in use. For example, if many COPY
745 instructions have the same data sizes, it may be worth to encode these
746 instructions more compactly than others.
747
748 The Vcdiff data format is designed so that a decoder does not need to be
749 aware of the choices made in encoding algorithms. This is achieved with the
750 notion of an "instruction code table" containing 256 entries. Each entry
751 defines either a single delta instruction or a pair of instructions that
752 have been combined. Note that the code table itself only exists in main
753 memory, not in the delta file (unless using an application-defined code
754 table, described in Section 7). The encoded data simply includes the index
755 of each instruction and, since there are only 256 indices, each index
756 can be represented as a single byte.
757
758 Each instruction code entry contains six fields, each of which
759 is a single byte with unsigned value:
760
761 +-----------------------------------------------+
762 | inst1 | size1 | mode1 | inst2 | size2 | mode2 |
763 +-----------------------------------------------+
764
765@@@ could be more compact
766
767 Each triple (inst,size,mode) defines a delta instruction. The meanings
768 of these fields are as follows:
769
770 inst: An "inst" field can have one of the four values: NOOP (0), ADD (1),
771 RUN (2) or COPY (3) to indicate the instruction types. NOOP means
772 that no instruction is specified. In this case, both the corresponding
773 size and mode fields will be zero.
774
775 size: A "size" field is zero or positive. A value zero means that the
776 size associated with the instruction is encoded separately as
777 an integer in the "Instructions and sizes section" (Section 6).
778 A positive value for "size" defines the actual data size.
779 Note that since the size is restricted to a byte, the maximum
780 value for any instruction with size implicitly defined in the code
781 table is 255.
782
783 mode: A "mode" field is significant only when the associated delta
784 instruction is a COPY. It defines the mode used to encode the
785 associated addresses. For other instructions, this is always zero.
786
787
7885.5 The Code Table
789
790 Following the discussions on address modes and instruction code tables,
791 we define a "Code Table" to have the data below:
792
793 s_near: the size of the near cache,
794 s_same: the size of the same cache,
795 i_code: the 256-entry instruction code table.
796
797 Vcdiff itself defines a "default code table" in which s_near is 4
798 and s_same is 3. Thus, there are 9 address modes for a COPY instruction.
799 The first two are VCD_SELF (0) and VCD_HERE (1). Modes 2, 3, 4 and 5
800 are for addresses coded against the near cache. And, modes 6, 7 and 8
801 are for addresses coded against the same cache.
802
803 The default instruction code table is depicted below, in a compact
804 representation that we use only for descriptive purposes. See section 7
805 for the specification of how an instruction code table is represented
806 in the Vcdiff encoding format. In the depiction, a zero value for
807 size indicates that the size is separately coded. The mode of non-COPY
808 instructions is represented as 0 even though they are not used.
809
810
811 TYPE SIZE MODE TYPE SIZE MODE INDEX
812 ---------------------------------------------------------------
813 1. RUN 0 0 NOOP 0 0 0
814 2. ADD 0, [1,17] 0 NOOP 0 0 [1,18]
815 3. COPY 0, [4,18] 0 NOOP 0 0 [19,34]
816 4. COPY 0, [4,18] 1 NOOP 0 0 [35,50]
817 5. COPY 0, [4,18] 2 NOOP 0 0 [51,66]
818 6. COPY 0, [4,18] 3 NOOP 0 0 [67,82]
819 7. COPY 0, [4,18] 4 NOOP 0 0 [83,98]
820 8. COPY 0, [4,18] 5 NOOP 0 0 [99,114]
821 9. COPY 0, [4,18] 6 NOOP 0 0 [115,130]
822 10. COPY 0, [4,18] 7 NOOP 0 0 [131,146]
823 11. COPY 0, [4,18] 8 NOOP 0 0 [147,162]
824 12. ADD [1,4] 0 COPY [4,6] 0 [163,174]
825 13. ADD [1,4] 0 COPY [4,6] 1 [175,186]
826 14. ADD [1,4] 0 COPY [4,6] 2 [187,198]
827 15. ADD [1,4] 0 COPY [4,6] 3 [199,210]
828 16. ADD [1,4] 0 COPY [4,6] 4 [211,222]
829 17. ADD [1,4] 0 COPY [4,6] 5 [223,234]
830 18. ADD [1,4] 0 COPY 4 6 [235,238]
831 19. ADD [1,4] 0 COPY 4 7 [239,242]
832 20. ADD [1,4] 0 COPY 4 8 [243,246]
833 21. COPY 4 [0,8] ADD 1 0 [247,255]
834 ---------------------------------------------------------------
835
836 In the above depiction, each numbered line represents one or more
837 entries in the actual instruction code table (recall that an entry in
838 the instruction code table may represent up to two combined delta
839 instructions.) The last column ("INDEX") shows which index value or
840 range of index values of the entries covered by that line. The notation
841 [i,j] means values from i through j, inclusive. The first 6 columns of
842 a line in the depiction describe the pairs of instructions used for
843 the corresponding index value(s).
844
845 If a line in the depiction includes a column entry using the [i,j]
846 notation, this means that the line is instantiated for each value
847 in the range from i to j, inclusive. The notation "0, [i,j]" means
848 that the line is instantiated for the value 0 and for each value
849 in the range from i to j, inclusive.
850
851 If a line in the depiction includes more than one entry using the [i,j]
852 notation, implying a "nested loop" to convert the line to a range of
853 table entries, the first such [i,j] range specifies the outer loop,
854 and the second specifies the inner loop.
855
856 The below examples should make clear the above description:
857
858 Line 1 shows the single RUN instruction with index 0. As the size field
859 is 0, this RUN instruction always has its actual size encoded separately.
860
861 Line 2 shows the 18 single ADD instructions. The ADD instruction with
862 size field 0 (i.e., the actual size is coded separately) has index 1.
863 ADD instructions with sizes from 1 to 17 use code indices 2 to 18 and
864 their sizes are as given (so they will not be separately encoded.)
865
866 Following the single ADD instructions are the single COPY instructions
867 ordered by their address encoding modes. For example, line 11 shows the
868 COPY instructions with mode 8, i.e., the last of the same cache.
869 In this case, the COPY instruction with size field 0 has index 147.
870 Again, the actual size of this instruction will be coded separately.
871
872 Lines 12 to 21 show the pairs of instructions that are combined together.
873 For example, line 12 depicts the 12 entries in which an ADD instruction
874 is combined with an immediately following COPY instruction. The entries
875 with indices 163, 164, 165 represent the pairs in which the ADD
876 instructions all have size 1 while the COPY instructions has mode
877 0 (VCD_SELF) and sizes 4, 5 and 6 respectively.
878
879 The last line, line 21, shows the eight instruction pairs where the first
880 instruction is a COPY and the second is an ADD. In this case, all COPY
881 instructions have size 4 with mode ranging from 0 to 8 and all the ADD
882 instructions have size 1. Thus, the entry with largest index 255
883 combines a COPY instruction of size 4 and mode 8 with an ADD instruction
884 of size 1.
885
886 The choice of the minimum size 4 for COPY instructions in the default code
887 table was made from experiments that showed that excluding small matches
888 (less then 4 bytes long) improved the compression rates.
889
890
8916. DECODING A TARGET WINDOW
892
893 Section 4.3 discusses that the delta instructions and associated data
894 are encoded in three arrays of bytes:
895
896 Data section for ADDs and RUNs,
897 Instructions and sizes section, and
898 Addresses section for COPYs.
899
900
901 Further, these data sections may have been further compressed by some
902 secondary compressor. Assuming that any such compressed data has been
903 decompressed so that we now have three arrays:
904
905 inst: bytes coding the instructions and sizes.
906 data: unmatched data associated with ADDs and RUNs.
907 addr: bytes coding the addresses of COPYs.
908
909 These arrays are organized as follows:
910
911 inst:
912 a sequence of (index, [size1], [size2]) tuples, where "index"
913 is an index into the instruction code table, and size1 and size2
914 are integers that MAY or MAY NOT be included in the tuple as
915 follows. The entry with the given "index" in the instruction
916 code table potentially defines two delta instructions. If the
917 first delta instruction is not a VCD_NOOP and its size is zero,
918 then size1 MUST be present. Otherwise, size1 MUST be omitted and
919 the size of the instruction (if it is not VCD_NOOP) is as defined
920 in the table. The presence or absence of size2 is defined
921 similarly with respect to the second delta instruction.
922
923 data:
924 a sequence of data values, encoded as bytes.
925
926 addr:
927 a sequence of address values. Addresses are normally encoded as
928 integers as described in Section 2 (i.e., base 128).
929 Since the same cache emits addresses in the range [0,255],
930 however, same cache addresses are always encoded as a
931 single byte.
932
933 To summarize, each tuple in the "inst" array includes an index to some
934 entry in the instruction code table that determines:
935
936 a. Whether one or two instructions were encoded and their types.
937
938 b. If the instructions have their sizes encoded separately, these
939 sizes will follow, in order, in the tuple.
940
941 c. If the instructions have accompanying data, i.e., ADDs or RUNs,
942 their data will be in the array "data".
943
944 d. Similarly, if the instructions are COPYs, the coded addresses are
945 found in the array "addr".
946
947 The decoding procedure simply processes the arrays by reading one code
948 index at a time, looking up the corresponding instruction code entry,
949 then consuming the respective sizes, data and addresses following the
950 directions in this entry. In other words, the decoder maintains an implicit
951 next-element pointer for each array; "consuming" an instruction tuple,
952 data, or address value implies incrementing the associated pointer.
953
954 For example, if during the processing of the target window, the next
955 unconsumed tuple in the inst array has index value 19, then the first
956 instruction is a COPY, whose size is found as the immediately following
957 integer in the inst array. Since the mode of this COPY instruction is
958 VCD_SELF, the corresponding address is found by consuming the next
959 integer in the addr array. The data array is left intact. As the second
960 instruction for code index 19 is a NOOP, this tuple is finished.
961
962
9637. APPLICATION-DEFINED CODE TABLES
964
965 Although the default code table used in Vcdiff is good for general
966 purpose encoders, there are times when other code tables may perform
967 better. For example, to code a file with many identical segments of data,
968 it may be advantageous to have a COPY instruction with the specific size
969 of these data segments so that the instruction can be encoded in a single
970 byte. Such a special code table MUST then be encoded in the delta file
971 so that the decoder can reconstruct it before decoding the data.
972
973 Vcdiff allows an application-defined code table to be specified
974 in a delta file with the following data:
975
976 Size of near cache - byte
977 Size of same cache - byte
978 Compressed code table data
979
980 The "compressed code table data" encodes the delta between the default
981 code table (source) and the new code table (target) in the same manner as
982 described in Section 4.3 for encoding a target window in terms of a
983 source window. This delta is computed using the following steps:
984
985 a. Convert the new instruction code table into a string, "code", of
986 1536 bytes using the below steps in order:
987
988 i. Add in order the 256 bytes representing the types of the first
989 instructions in the instruction pairs.
990 ii. Add in order the 256 bytes representing the types of the second
991 instructions in the instruction pairs.
992 iii. Add in order the 256 bytes representing the sizes of the first
993 instructions in the instruction pairs.
994 iv. Add in order the 256 bytes representing the sizes of the second
995 instructions in the instruction pairs.
996 v. Add in order the 256 bytes representing the modes of the first
997 instructions in the instruction pairs.
998 vi. Add in order the 256 bytes representing the modes of the second
999 instructions in the instruction pairs.
1000
1001 b. Similarly, convert the default instruction code table into
1002 a string "dflt".
1003
1004 c. Treat the string "code" as a target window and "dflt" as the
1005 corresponding source data and apply an encoding algorithm to
1006 compute the delta encoding of "code" in terms of "dflt".
1007 This computation MUST use the default code table for encoding
1008 the delta instructions.
1009
1010 The decoder can then reverse the above steps to decode the compressed
1011 table data using the method of Section 6, employing the default code
1012 table, to generate the new code table. Note that the decoder does not
1013 need to know anything about the details of the encoding algorithm used
1014 in step (c). The decoder is still able to decode the new code table
1015 because the Vcdiff format is independent from the choice of encoding
1016 algorithm, and because the encoder in step (c) uses the known, default
1017 code table.
1018
1019
10208. PERFORMANCE
1021
1022 The encoding format is compact. For compression only, using the LZ-77
1023 string parsing strategy and without any secondary compressors, the typical
1024 compression rate is better than Unix compress and close to gzip. For
1025 differencing, the data format is better than all known methods in
1026 terms of its stated goal, which is primarily decoding speed and
1027 encoding efficiency.
1028
1029 We compare the performance of compress, gzip and Vcdiff using the
1030 archives of three versions of the Gnu C compiler, gcc-2.95.1.tar,
1031 gcc-2.95.2.tar and gcc-2.95.3.tar. The experiments were done on an
1032 SGI-MIPS3, 400MHZ. Gzip was used at its default compression level.
1033 Vcdiff timings were done using the Vcodex/Vcdiff software (Section 13).
1034 As string and window matching typically dominates the computation during
1035 compression, the Vcdiff compression times were directly due to the
1036 algorithms used in the Vcodex/Vcdiff software. However, the decompression
1037 times should be generic and representative of any good implementation
1038 of the Vcdiff data format. Timing was done by running each program
1039 three times and taking the average of the total cpu+system times.
1040
1041 Below are the different Vcdiff runs:
1042
1043 Vcdiff: vcdiff is used as compressor only.
1044
1045 Vcdiff-d: vcdiff is used as a differencer only. That is, it only
1046 compares target data against source data. Since the files
1047 involved are large, they are broken into windows. In this
1048 case, each target window starting at some file offset in
1049 the target file is compared against a source window with
1050 the same file offset (in the source file). The source
1051 window is also slightly larger than the target window
1052 to increase matching opportunities. The -d option also gives
1053 a hint to the string matching algorithm of Vcdiff that
1054 the two files are very similar with long stretches of matches.
1055 The algorithm takes advantage of this to minimize its
1056 processing of source data and save time.
1057
1058 Vcdiff-dc: This is similar to Vcdiff-d but vcdiff can also compare
1059 target data against target data as applicable. Thus, vcdiff
1060 both computes differences and compresses data. The windowing
1061 algorithm is the same as above. However, the above hint is
1062 recinded in this case.
1063
1064 Vcdiff-dcs: This is similar to Vcdiff-dc but the windowing algorithm
1065 uses a content-based heuristic to select source data segments
1066 that are more likely to match with a given target window.
1067 Thus, the source data segment selected for a target window
1068 often will not be aligned with the file offsets of this
1069 target window.
1070
1071
1072 gcc-2.95.1 gcc-2.95.2 compression decompression
1073 raw size 55746560 55797760
1074 compress - 19939390 13.85s 7.09s
1075 gzip - 12973443 42.99s 5.35s
1076 Vcdiff - 15358786 20.04s 4.65s
1077 Vcdiff-d - 100971 10.93s 1.92s
1078 Vcdiff-dc - 97246 20.03s 1.84s
1079 Vcdiff-dcs - 256445 44.81s 1.84s
1080
1081 TABLE 1. Compressing gcc-2.95.2.tar given gcc-2.95.1
1082
1083
1084 TABLE 1 shows the raw sizes of gcc-2.95.1.tar and gcc-2.95.2.tar and the
1085 sizes of the compressed results. As a pure compressor, the compression
1086 rate for Vcdiff is worse than gzip and better than compress. The last
1087 three rows shows that when two file versions are very similar, differencing
1088 can have dramatically good compression rates. Vcdiff-d and Vcdiff-dc use
1089 the same simple window selection method but Vcdiff-dc also does compression
1090 so its output is slightly smaller. Vcdiff-dcs uses a heuristic based on
1091 data content to search for source data that likely will match a given target
1092 window. Although it does a good job, the heuristic did not always find the
1093 best matches which are given by the simple algorithm of Vcdiff-d. As a
1094 result, the output size is slightly larger. Note also that there is a large
1095 cost in computing matching windows this way. Finally, the compression times
1096 of Vcdiff-d is nearly half of that of Vcdiff-dc. It is tempting to conclude
1097 that the compression feature causes the additional time in Vcdiff-dc
1098 relative to Vcdiff-d. However, this is not the case. The hint given to
1099 the Vcdiff string matching algorithm that the two files are likely to
1100 have very long stretches of matches helps the algorithm to minimize
1101 processing of the "source data", thus saving half the time. However, as we
1102 shall see below when this hint is wrong, the result is even longer time.
1103
1104
1105 gcc-2.95.2 gcc-2.95.3 compression decompression
1106 raw size 55797760 55787520
1107 compress - 19939453 13.54s 7.00s
1108 gzip - 12998097 42.63s 5.62s
1109 Vcdiff - 15371737 20.09s 4.74s
1110 Vcdiff-d - 26383849 71.41s 6.41s
1111 Vcdiff-dc - 14461203 42.48s 4.82s
1112 Vcdiff-dcs - 1248543 61.18s 1.99s
1113
1114 TABLE 2. Compressing gcc-2.95.3.tar given gcc-2.95.2
1115
1116
1117 TABLE 2 shows the raw sizes of gcc-2.95.2.tar and gcc-2.95.3.tar and
1118 the sizes of the compressed results. In this case, the tar file of
1119 gcc-2.95.3 is rearranged in a way that makes the straightforward method
1120 of matching file offsets for source and target windows fail. As a
1121 result, Vcdiff-d performs rather dismally both in time and output size.
1122 The large time for Vcdiff-d is directly due to fact that the string
1123 matching algorithm has to work much harder to find matches when the hint
1124 that two files have long matching stretches fails to hold. On the other
1125 hand, Vcdiff-dc does both differencing and compression resulting in good
1126 output size. Finally, the window searching heuristic used in Vcdiff-dcs is
1127 effective in finding the right matching source windows for target windows
1128 resulting a small output size. This shows why the data format needs to
1129 have a way to specify matching windows to gain performance. Finally,
1130 we note that the decoding times are always good regardless of how
1131 the string matching or window searching algorithms perform.
1132
1133
11349. FURTHER ISSUES
1135
1136 This document does not address a few issues:
1137
1138 Secondary compressors:
1139 As discussed in Section 4.3, certain sections in the delta encoding
1140 of a window may be further compressed by a secondary compressor.
1141 In our experience, the basic Vcdiff format is adequate for most
1142 purposes so that secondary compressors are seldom needed. In
1143 particular, for normal use of data differencing where the files to
1144 be compared have long stretches of matches, much of the gain in
1145 compression rate is already achieved by normal string matching.
1146 Thus, the use of secondary compressors is seldom needed in this case.
1147 However, for applications beyond differencing of such nearly identical
1148 files, secondary compressors may be needed to achieve maximal
1149 compressed results.
1150
1151 Therefore, we recommend to leave the Vcdiff data format defined
1152 as in this document so that the use of secondary compressors
1153 can be implemented when they become needed in the future.
1154 The formats of the compressed data via such compressors or any
1155 compressors that may be defined in the future are left open to
1156 their implementations. These could include Huffman encoding,
1157 arithmetic encoding, and splay tree encoding [8,9].
1158
1159 Large file system vs. small file system:
1160 As discussed in Section 4, a target window in a large file may be
1161 compared against some source window in another file or in the same
1162 file (from some earlier part). In that case, the file offset of the
1163 source window is specified as a variable-sized integer in the delta
1164 encoding. There is a possibility that the encoding was computed on
1165 a system supporting much larger files than in a system where
1166 the data may be decoded (e.g., 64-bit file systems vs. 32-bit file
1167 systems). In that case, some target data may not be recoverable.
1168 This problem could afflict any compression format, and ought
1169 to be resolved with a generic negotiation mechanism in the
1170 appropriate protocol(s).
1171
1172
117310. SUMMARY
1174
1175 We have described Vcdiff, a general and portable encoding format for
1176 compression and differencing. The format is good in that it allows
1177 implementing a decoder without knowledge of the encoders. Further,
1178 ignoring the use of secondary compressors not defined within the format,
1179 the decoding algorithms runs in linear time and requires working space
1180 proportional to window sizes.
1181
1182
1183
118411. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1185
1186 Thanks are due to Balachander Krishnamurthy, Jeff Mogul and Arthur Van Hoff
1187 who provided much encouragement to publicize Vcdiff. In particular, Jeff
1188 helped clarifying the description of the data format presented here.
1189
1190
1191
119212. SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
1193
1194 Vcdiff only provides a format to encode compressed and differenced data.
1195 It does not address any issues concerning how such data are, in fact,
1196 stored in a given file system or the run-time memory of a computer system.
1197 Therefore, we do not anticipate any security issues with respect to Vcdiff.
1198
1199
1200
120113. SOURCE CODE AVAILABILITY
1202
1203 Vcdiff is implemented as a data transforming method in Phong Vo's
1204 Vcodex library. AT&T Corp. has made the source code for Vcodex available
1205 for anyone to use to transmit data via HTTP/1.1 Delta Encoding [10,11].
1206 The source code and according license is accessible at the below URL:
1207
1208 http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools
1209
1210
121114. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
1212
1213 The IETF has been notified of intellectual property rights claimed in
1214 regard to some or all of the specification contained in this
1215 document. For more information consult the online list of claimed
1216 rights, at <http://www.ietf.org/ipr.html>.
1217
1218 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
1219 intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
1220 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
1221 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
1222 might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
1223 has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
1224 IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
1225 standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
1226 claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
1227 licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
1228 obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
1229 proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
1230 be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
1231
1232
1233
123415. IANA CONSIDERATIONS
1235
1236 The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) administers the number
1237 space for Secondary Compressor ID values. Values and their meaning
1238 must be documented in an RFC or other peer-reviewed, permanent, and
1239 readily available reference, in sufficient detail so that
1240 interoperability between independent implementations is possible.
1241 Subject to these constraints, name assignments are First Come, First
1242 Served - see RFC2434 [13]. Legal ID values are in the range 1..255.
1243
1244 This document does not define any values in this number space.
1245
1246
124716. REFERENCES
1248
1249 [1] D.G. Korn and K.P. Vo, Vdelta: Differencing and Compression,
1250 Practical Reusable Unix Software, Editor B. Krishnamurthy,
1251 John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.
1252
1253 [2] J. Ziv and A. Lempel, A Universal Algorithm for Sequential Data
1254 Compression, IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 23(3):337-343, 1977.
1255
1256 [3] W. Tichy, The String-to-String Correction Problem with Block Moves,
1257 ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 2(4):309-321, November 1984.
1258
1259 [4] E.M. McCreight, A Space-Economical Suffix Tree Construction
1260 Algorithm, Journal of the ACM, 23:262-272, 1976.
1261
1262 [5] J.J. Hunt, K.P. Vo, W. Tichy, An Empirical Study of Delta Algorithms,
1263 IEEE Software Configuration and Maintenance Workshop, 1996.
1264
1265 [6] J.J. Hunt, K.P. Vo, W. Tichy, Delta Algorithms: An Empirical Analysis,
1266 ACM Trans. on Software Engineering and Methodology, 7:192-214, 1998.
1267
1268 [7] D.G. Korn, K.P. Vo, Sfio: A buffered I/O Library,
1269 Proc. of the Summer '91 Usenix Conference, 1991.
1270
1271 [8] D. W. Jones, Application of Splay Trees to Data Compression,
1272 CACM, 31(8):996:1007.
1273
1274 [9] M. Nelson, J. Gailly, The Data Compression Book, ISBN 1-55851-434-1,
1275 M&T Books, New York, NY, 1995.
1276
1277 [10] J.C. Mogul, F. Douglis, A. Feldmann, and B. Krishnamurthy,
1278 Potential benefits of delta encoding and data compression for HTTP,
1279 SIGCOMM '97, Cannes, France, 1997.
1280
1281 [11] J.C. Mogul, B. Krishnamurthy, F. Douglis, A. Feldmann,
1282 Y. Goland, and A. Van Hoff, Delta Encoding in HTTP,
1283 IETF, draft-mogul-http-delta-10, 2001.
1284
1285 [12] S. Bradner, Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,
1286 RFC 2119, March 1997.
1287
1288 [13] T. Narten, H. Alvestrand, Guidelines for Writing an IANA
1289 Considerations Section in RFCs, RFC2434, October 1998.
1290
1291
1292
129317. AUTHOR'S ADDRESS
1294
1295 Kiem-Phong Vo (main contact)
1296 AT&T Labs, Room D223
1297 180 Park Avenue
1298 Florham Park, NJ 07932
1299 Email: kpv@research.att.com
1300 Phone: 1 973 360 8630
1301
1302 David G. Korn
1303 AT&T Labs, Room D237
1304 180 Park Avenue
1305 Florham Park, NJ 07932
1306 Email: dgk@research.att.com
1307 Phone: 1 973 360 8602
1308
1309 Jeffrey C. Mogul
1310 Western Research Laboratory
1311 Compaq Computer Corporation
1312 250 University Avenue
1313 Palo Alto, California, 94305, U.S.A.
1314 Email: JeffMogul@acm.org
1315 Phone: 1 650 617 3304 (email preferred)
1316
1317 Joshua P. MacDonald
1318 Computer Science Division
1319 University of California, Berkeley
1320 345 Soda Hall
1321 Berkeley, CA 94720
1322 Email: jmacd@cs.berkeley.edu
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.