To be honest, that sample syntax makes me want to shoot myself in the head, although XmlTools' existing syntax is almost as bad sometimes :-)
There's a whole can of worms that I could open here about the additional need for 'for' loops and variables in order to make some patch mods possible. I think I'll open a new ticket for that so that s10k can reply to this on its own if he desires, but I encourage everyone to take a higher-level look at what we're trying to do here rather than shoe-horning increasingly complex concepts into a linear, very unreadable and fragmented grammar. That higher-level look will be in a new ticket shortly.
